Entries Tagged with violence

December 20th, 2006

What You Should Be Reading — 12/20/06

  • Detained In Iraq by Brendan Skwire @ All Spin Zone; another American abused for doing “the right thing” by a system that has become dangerous for Americans and nonAmericans alike. I bet he thinks twice before he acts so heroically in the future.

    Detainee 200343 was among thousands of people who have been held and released by the American military in Iraq, and his account of his ordeal has provided one of the few detailed views of the Pentagon’s detention operations since the abuse scandals at Abu Ghraib. Yet in many respects his case is unusual.The detainee was Donald Vance, a 29-year-old Navy veteran from Chicago who went to Iraq as a security contractor. He wound up as a whistle-blower, passing information to the F.B.I. about suspicious activities at the Iraqi security firm where he worked, including what he said was possible illegal weapons trading.But when American soldiers raided the company at his urging, Mr. Vance and another American who worked there were detained as suspects by the military, which was unaware that Mr. Vance was an informer, according to officials and military documents.

    “Even Saddam Hussein had more legal counsel than I ever had,” said Mr. Vance, who said he planned to sue the former defense secretary, Donald H. Rumsfeld, on grounds that his constitutional rights had been violated. “While we were detained, we wrote a letter to the camp commandant stating that the same democratic ideals we are trying to instill in the fledgling democratic country of Iraq, from simple due process to the Magna Carta, we are absolutely, positively refusing to follow ourselves.”

  • Detainee Abuse by Tim F. @ Balloon Juice; more on Donald Vance

    American guards arrived at the man’s cell periodically over the next several days, shackled his hands and feet, blindfolded him and took him to a padded room for interrogation, the detainee said. After an hour or two, he was returned to his cell, fatigued but unable to sleep.

    The fluorescent lights in his cell were never turned off, he said. At most hours, heavy metal or country music blared in the corridor. He said he was rousted at random times without explanation and made to stand in his cell. Even lying down, he said, he was kept from covering his face to block out the light, noise and cold. And when he was released after 97 days he was exhausted, depressed and scared.

  • Our path to ‘victory’ ends in defeat by Mark Morford @ SFGate.com

    It’s not like we were overpowered. We weren’t outmanned or outgunned or outstrategized, hence we weren’t defeated in any “traditional,” kick-ass, take-names, sign-the-peace-accord way.

    It wasn’t because our can’t-lose military didn’t have the latest and greatest killing tools of all time, the biggest budget, the most heroic of baffled and misled young soldiers sort of but not really willing to go off and fight and die for a cause no one could adequately explain or justify to them.

    We still have the coolest, fastest planes. We still have the meanest billion-dollar technology. We still have the most imposing tanks and the most incredible weaponry and the badass night-vision goggles with the laser sights and the thermal heat-seeking readouts and the ability to track targets from 2 miles away in a dust storm. It doesn’t matter.

    What we don’t have is any idea what we’re doing, not anymore, not on the global stage. We lost this “war” and we lost it before we even began because we went in for all the wrong reasons and with all the wrong planning and with all the wrong leadership who had all the wrong motives based on all the wrong greedy self-serving insular faux cowboy BS that your kids and your grandkids will be paying for until about the year 2056.

    Maybe you don’t agree. Maybe you say, “Wait, wait, wait, it’s not over at all, and we haven’t lost yet. Isn’t the fighting still raging? Can’t we still ‘win’ even though we’re still losing soldiers by the truckload and thousands of innocent Iraqis are being brutally slaughtered every month and isn’t Dubya still standing there, brow scrunched and confounded as a monkey clinging onto a shiny razor blade, refusing to let go and free us from the deadly trap, ignoring the Iraq Study Group and trying to figure out a way to stay the course and never give in and “mission accomplished” even as every single human around him, from the top generals to crusty old James Baker to the new and shockingly honest secretary of defense, says we are royally screwed and Iraq is now a vicious and chaotic civil war and it’s officially one of the worst disasters in American history?” Oh wait, you just answered your own question.

    Yes, technically, the war is still on. The fighting is not over. And, yes, you can even say we (brutally, tactlessly) installed ourselves with sufficient ego to give us a modicum of violent, volatile control over the gulf region’s remaining petroleum reserves — which was, of course, much of the point in the first place.

    But the nasty us-versus-them, good-versus-evil ideology is over. Ditto the numb sense of Bush’s brutally simpleminded American “justice.” Any lingering hint of anything resembling a truly valid and lucid and deeply patriotic reason for wasting a trillion dollars and thousands of lives and roughly an entire generation’s worth of international respect? Gone.

    What’s left is one lingering, looming question: How do we accept defeat? How do we deal with the awkward, identity-mauling, ego-stomping idea that, once again, America didn’t “win” a war it really had no right to launch in the first place? After all, isn’t this the American slogan: “We may not always be right, but we are never wrong”?

    It’s still our most favorite idea, the thing our own childlike president loves to talk most about, burned into our national consciousness like a bad tattoo: We always win. We’re the good guys. We’re the chosen ones. We’re the goddamn cavalry, flying the flag of truth, wrapped in strip malls and Ford pickups and McDonald’s franchises. Right?

    More

    Tags: , , , , , , ,

October 17th, 2006

Recommended Reading — Mostly Women’s Rights Edition

  • A Proposed Small Step For Womenkind — Buttercup @ Buttercup & Bean writes about the problem of unwanted attention from men and how the real problem is not that women are putting themselves in situations where they could become targets but that men feel that they are entitled to any “piece of female ass that shows up in their vicinity.” Excellent post.
  • To iPod or not to iPod (or, See the Person!) — Colleen @ For All the World to See wonders if technology isn’t creating a society of isolation and anti-social individuals.

    We pass people in the grocery, on the street, at school, at work, in the car and they’re just people. The plural, the generic, the masses.

    But they aren’t. Each person is a person.

    And what a difference we would make if we saw each one of those people as a person , not as one of a mass.

    As an individual, who maybe had a bad day, woke up on the wrong side of the bed, their coffee maker didn’t work this morning, they got in a fight with their kid, they got some unexpected money, they passed a test, they finished a big project, have a headache, found out their mom has cancer, found out their wife was pregnant….

    You get the idea.

    What if we each did that, maybe not to every person we came in contact with, but made an effort to really see the person we pass on the grocery aisle or who serves us our coffee, or who takes the parking place we had our eye on? What if?

    What if we didn’t wear our iPods so as to be lost in our own little world, but instead had the earphones out of our ears, so we heard the little old lady behind us in the grocery ask for help getting something down…or we actually talked to the server who takes our order, instead of talking to them in short, one-word comments while our cell phone is pressed to our face?

  • More

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

April 2nd, 2006

Maine Law Protects Animals From Domestic Abuse

Posted in In the News, The World by n. mallory

I was disappointed in the 2004 election when Maine voted not to make bear baiting illegal like the rest of the country. However, in the two years since I’ve been here, I have been increasingly surprised by Maine’s progressive march into this new century.

On Friday, Governor John Baldacci signed a bill that includes animals in protection orders in domestic violence cases!

“Many national studies on victims of domestic violence tell us that their abusers have threatened to kill, threatened to harm or actually harmed their pets as a means of keeping the victim from leaving the relationship,” Mr. Baldacci, a Democrat, said. “With this new law, we hope to help remove another tool for emotional and physical violence used by the abuser to exert power and control over their victims.”Maine is believed to be the first state with such a law. But the issue has captured attention around the country as police departments, domestic-violence programs, animal protection societies and state officials become increasingly aware of a link between domestic violence and animal abuse. [“New Maine Law Shields Animals in Domestic Violence Cases” (The New York Times)]

Yeah for Maine!

Tags: ,

August 17th, 2005

Workplace Violence & Gun Control

Gun-related violence is one of the leading causes of workplace deaths. The Bureau of Labor and Statistics reports that there were 632 workplace homicides in 2003 - accounting for over one-tenth of all workplace fatalities.

In addition, a recent study published in the American Journal of Public Health found that workplaces that allow workers to carry firearms and other weapons at work were 5-7 times more likely to be the site of an on the job homicide compared to workplaces that prohibit workers from carrying weapons. [“NRA Calls for Boycott of ConocoPhillips; Visit your Neighborhood Phillips 66 Today”]

Seems obvious, doesn’t it? Some sort of “No Gun Policy” at work seems to make the workplace just a tad safer. I like the idea of going to work and not being a little worried about what might be in who’s briefcase.

If you aren’t a Federal Marshall, a hunter, a law enforcer, or a security guard, why would you need to bring a gun to work?

Apparently there are two states (Oklahoma and Kentucky) that prohibit businesses from banning weapons on their own property. Several companies including ConocoPhillips are fighting the Oklahoma 2003 law in Federal Court

“ConocoPhillips supports the Second Amendment and respects the rights of law abiding citizens to own guns,” the Houston-based oil company says in a written statement. “Our primary concern is the safety of all our employees. We are simply trying to provide a safe and secure working environment for our employees by keeping guns out of our facilities, including our company parking lots.” [“Worker right or workplace danger?”]

In response, the National Rifle Association (NRA) has called for a boycott of ConocoPhillips, despite evidence that workplace gun bans do lower risk to employees.

Businesses should have a reasonable right to restrict what employees can and can’t do on their own property (just like I do not allow anyone to smoke in my home). If my employer can tell me what I can and can’t wear or pierce or tattoo then they should also be able to make rules that will protect me while I’m in their dress-code, right? I think it’s even more important that they have control over what gets brought on their property since they are the ones libale if someone is shot or injured while on the property.

Anyway, I’m off to find a Conoco or Phillips 66 gas station to fill up my Jeep. ;)

On a personal note, having once been mugged at gunpoint and realizing at the time that even if I had been armed, there was nothing I could have done, plus having nearly been shot in a New Year’s Eve celebration (bullets that get disharged have to go somewhere, folks!), I have no liking for weapons and my friends back home knew that guns were not welcome in my home. Yet they still came to visit and quite often.

Tags: , , ,

  • Flair

  • Meta

  • Bad Behavior has blocked 1852 access attempts in the last 7 days.

    Netflix, Inc.