Entries Tagged with airport

November 8th, 2006

Flying Out Of Portland

Posted in My Life, The Puppy by n. mallory

I know it’s been a while.  I kind of get around to posting things when I feel like it these days.  I meant to post right away about my experience flying out of the Portland Jetport in Maine but I didn’t have access to a computer while on my trip and when I got back, I had company and then one thing led to another and then I just never got around to it.

So, today I’m getting around to it.  So there.

I kind of felt it was important to report my observations since at the time of my flight in September, everyone was making such a big fuss about how a few of the 9-11 hijackers originated from the Portland Jetport.  I thought that maybe with that stigma in mind, the Portland Jetport might be extra careful with security.

Pugly and I arrived at the U.S. Airways counter a good two hours early.  (If you recall, I always arrive at least two hours early at every airport due to the fact that no matter where I am going or how well I’ve followed the rules I always end up in some sort of altercation with airport security — I suspect I am considered to be on some list and have been since 9-11 — and that this has resulted in the fact that friends and family will no longer travel with me or even on the same day or airline with me.)

To the clerk at the U.S. Airways counter, I presented my folded up piece of paper from priceline.com indicating that I had purchased a plane ticket online to Cleveland that took me to Philadelphia first.  No one ever asked me for any picture identification.  I did have to present a credit card to pay for the extra carry-on baggage of a dog in a carrier.  (Note:  No one measured the carrier or weighed the dog to determine that either fit the requirements for the flight.)  Comments were made that Pugly was the cutest dog ever seen.

I handed my check-in luggage to the man at the giant x-ray machine and Pugly and I headed upstairs toward the gates.

If you’ve ever been to the Portland Jetport, then you know.  There’s nothing in the Portland Jetport.  Before the Security Gates, you have your choice of a concession stand and a magazine stand.  Pugly and I sat around for a while eating snacks and letting kiddies pet him.  Then we went in the magazine stand and bought a box of Maine salt water taffy for my aunt since we were going to visit her and all.

When we had an hour left, we got in the security line.  Now here, they did ask for an ID.  Pugly had to come out of his carrier.  Women started gushing over him.  Again people started insisting that he was the cutest dog they’d ever seen.

Now here’s what I found amusing.  This was during the height of the “no liquid” scare.  You know, when they were throwing away your lipstick and hand lotion.  My lipstick made it through just fine, but that saltwater taffy that I just bought in the magazine stand a few feet away had to go under extreme scrutiny.  I guess you never know when terrorists will be sneaking saltwater bomb taffy on board.  They actually subjected those taffy to all kinds of electrical and chemical kinds of tests with there big machines that looked like something on  Pinky & the Brain or the old campy Batman shows.

Finally, Pugly, the saltwater taffy, and I made it through.

By the way, I never needed my ID again.  U.S. Airways never did need to be sure if I was me.  I just needed that folded up print-out from priceline.com.  I guess I should be comforted that at least TSA was checking, but somehow I’m not.

What you should know about the rest of the trip is this:

  • On the first U.S. Airlines trip, the stewardess didn’t care that the pet carrier was too large to fit under the seat and blocked both myself and the passenger sitting next to me from being able to make any kind of exit in case of an exit.
  • At the airport in Philadelphia, I was very frustrated by the fact that it is impossible to buy water bottles or other drink bottles in a size appropriate to the amount of time of your time between flights.  This was during the time when you still could not take pre-purchased drinks on airplanes after the London scare.
  • U.S. Airlines employees were not consistent in ensuring that boarders dispose of bottles of fluids before boarding.  The same stewardess would let some board but not others.  For example, I had to dispose of my Dysani but the man ahead of my could bring his Diet Coke.
  • On the second U.S. Airlines trip, I had to sit in a row by myself so as to not to affect other passengers with my oversized pet carrier in case of emergencies.
  • No one asked me to prove I was taking only my own luggage.

I was very glad that we drove back to Maine.

Tags: , , , ,

November 1st, 2006

Work Your Brain — 11/1/06

Tales of the Detainee Kind

October 31st, 2006

Work Your Brain — 10/31/06

Travel In America

  • Homeland Absurdity – Jill @ Brilliant at Breakfast reports that the difference between life and death is a ziploc bag apparently…

    There you have it: Tiny containers of hand sanitizer in zip-lock bags are harmless and approved. Those not in zip-lock bags are dangerous contraband. Meanwhile, the TSA still cannot justify its methods of confiscation: If certain liquids and gels are taken from a passenger, the assumption has to be that those materials are potentially hazardous. If so, why are they tossed unceremoniously into the trash? At every checkpoint you’ll see a bin or barrel brimming with illegal containers. They are not quarantined or handed over to the bomb squad; they are thrown away. In effect, the agency readily admits that it knows these things are harmless. But it’s going to steal them anyway, and either you like it or you don’t fly.

What the Fuck Are They Thinking?

September 20th, 2006

Work Your Brain — 09/20/06

September 9th, 2006

Work Your Brain — 09/09/06

A Little Fun First

  • Thursday Thirteen #2 — ribbiticus @ Pond Perspective offers some gems of advice. Here are my favorites:

    5. It may be that your sole purpose in life is simply to serve as a warning to others.

    10. Some mistakes are too much fun to only make once.

    11. We could learn a lot from crayons. Some are sharp, some are pretty and some are dull. Some have weird names, and all are different colors, but they all have to live in the same box.

    12. A truly happy person is one who can enjoy the scenery on a detour.

    13. Nobody cares if you can’t dance well. Just get up and dance.

More

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

September 6th, 2006

News Quickies — 09/06/06

  • Due to last month’s terror alert, British Airways is claiming a £40m ($75.9m) loss.  Between August 10th and 17th, it cancelled 1,280 flights and incurred costs of hotels, catering and recovering baggage for stranded passengers. [ BA says terror alert cost it £40m” (BBC News)]
  • “A coalition of 300 Iraqi tribal leaders on Saturday demanded the release of Saddam Hussein so he could reclaim the presidency and also called for armed resistance against U.S.-led forces.” Yikes! [“A Demand for Hussein’s Release” (WashingtonPost.com)]
  • On the fifth anniversary of the September 11th attacks, CNN will replay their coverage of the day’s events on the Internet.  Viewers will be able to watch how events unfolded starting at 8:30am, just minutes before the first reports of the first airplane hitting the World Trade Center started, all the way until midnight in real time.  For the day, the usually for-fee service will be free. [”CNN.com to replay 9/11 attacks coverage” (Yahoo!News)]

Tags: , , , , , , ,

August 28th, 2006

Don’t Panic: From The Accidental Terrorist To The Accidentally Terrorized

Posted in In the News, The World, 9-11 & Terrorism by n. mallory

Think back over your life.

What’s the most embarrassing thing you’ve ever did?

I’m sure the memory is still there hanging around in the shadows of your mind, waiting to jump forward to your memory forefront at an extremely inopportune moment. Your cheeks flush at the thought. You stomach flinchs. Maybe you even feel just a little bit queasy just at the mere hint of a flashback.

Maybe it’s something that happened 20 years ago in school and maybe no one but you remembers it. Maybe it’s something that happened last week in front of 15 strangers on a bus and no one but you remembers it. Still it haunts you, doesn’t it?

Then again, maybe your bestest friends remember all too well and just won’t let go and it’s the inside joke of inside jokes that just keeps getting told and will still be told, probably even at your 40th high school reunion.

Hey, we’ve all been there. Some of us go there on a fairly regular basis. In fact, so regular that we have a discount pass to the park.

Which is why, I really had to feel for this guy, self-nicknamed “Stupid”. At least after his embarrassing story made the press, he decided to tell his version of it. What exactly was his embarrassing, press-worthy act? He accidently dropped his iPod in an airplane toilet and ended up having to deal with airport security, the bomb squad, and Canada’s version of Homeland Security; he was interrogated as if he were a terrorist involved in 9/11 and the most recent liquid bomber plot and the rest of the passengers were held up for three hours because of him…and they knew it was because some moron dropped an iPod in the toilet. Put yourself in his shoes.

It all started when I got out of my seat to go to the bathroom. I went to the bathroom, washed my hands, and returned to my seat. A little while later the two stewardesses on the flight crossed each other in the aisle. They had a quick conversation that I was in earshot of.

“I locked off the front lav. There’s something in the toilet that’s preventing it from flushing. Run some water and see if you can clear it.” My face immediately turned red. The seat cover! I thought. It must have been too big to flush! I should have thrown it out!

I was so embarrassed. I tried to act normal … I took a sudden interest in the contents of the seat pocket in front of me, acted nonchalant and all. I watched as the stewardess got on her hands and knees in the lavatory and did unfathomable dirty work.

Sometime later, I decided it would be best if I forgot the whole thing happened, so I went to put on my headphones and drown myself in iPod music. But … no iPod. I panicked, checked my other pockets. Where was it? Not under the seat, not in the pockets, not … anywhere. I looked up to the stewardesses. One of them had run past me in a decent clip. She was carrying a green handbook. She brought it to the other stewardess. They flipped through the handbook, read a page, then made a call. The other stewardess had retrieved a blue metal box and was removing some equipment from it.

I put two and two together. I knew what had happened.

So I walked up to the stewardesses, both clamoring over the handbook, and tapped one on the shoulder.

“So, I had an iPod before I went to the bathroom, and now I don’t. I think I know what’s in the toilet.”

We had a quick conversation. I told them, “You don’t have to call the TSA or anything, it’s just my iPod.” They said, “Oh, but we already did.”

So now I’m starting to realize that this is turning into a big problem. They offer their condolences, tell me that it’s unfortunate, and I take a seat. Okay. So far, not so bad. I return to my seat and spend the rest of the flight trying to act normal.

That is, right up until the pilot comes over the intercom.

“Folks, this is the captain. I don’t want to alarm you, but we’ve found a suspicious device in the front lavatory. Now, we think it’s probably nothing, but in this day and age … you can never be too careful. We’ll be landing at Ottawa, where we will await further instructions.”

The cabin erupted with commotion. At that very moment, my face fell into my hands. What have I done?

We landed at Ottawa, and we were taxiing to the gate. Without warning, the airplane then lurched to a sudden halt.

“Folks, this is the captain. We’ve been ordered to make an immediate stop. Buses are coming to evacuate the aircraft.” We were to leave all of our belongings on the aircraft; we would be shuttled by bus to the terminal, where we would receive our carryon items.

[…]

It took them 45 minutes to round up not just a bus and air-stairs, but an army of police and customs vehicles. One of the stewardesses took me aside and whispered to me. “Get off the plane last, and talk to the constable.”

So I did. I exited the plane last, and spoke to the Ottawa police officer waiting at the air-stairs. I told him that the device was my iPod, and he took down my license number.

I continued to the bus. After a brief wait, it did NOT take us to the terminal. It took us to some industrial facility, where they housed utility vehicles. There, in the open garage, we were instructed to sit and wait. And wait we did … another 30 minutes or so.

This was possibly the worst part … While we were waiting I got to overhear the passengers talking about me. Well, they didn’t know it was me, but they knew someone had dropped an iPod in the toilet, and they made aaallll sorts of assumptions about this person.

“Why didn’t he have it on a clip? He could have clipped it to his damn pants.” Or, “Why didn’t he tell the stewardesses? Why is he hiding it from them and making us go through this?”

I could have corrected them. I could have told them that it WAS on a clip and I DID tell the stewardesses. In fact, it was a lot of self-restraint to just keep my mouth shut and not make things worse.

By this time the sense of guilt had left me. This wasn’t my fault. Anyone could have dropped his stupid iPod in the toilet. It’s really the government here. I mean, at this point the building contained six customs officials, an army of policemen, people from various security agencies, a bomb squad, and a couple of detectives. No one was doing anything. No one was taking charge. *I* didn’t create this mess.

The whole time, the officers were watching me. They had told me to keep in sight of them at all times.
Finally, five or six customs officers set up a table and made an announcement. “We will be interviewing each of you one by one. Please form a line. Before we have our chat, make sure you have your ID, passport, and customs information with you.”

One person asked, “What if that stuff is still on the plane?” The customs official responded, “Then we will have a more formal chat.”

I got in line with the rest of the people, but shortly thereafter two police officers took me out of line. “Come with us.”

They took me to a discreet corner. They brought out a tape recorder. I was told to put my hands up on the wall and spread my legs, and I was frisked from head to toe. They removed my wallet, disassembled it completely, and placed each of its contents in its own plastic evidence bag.

“Now Tim, for the sake of the tape recorder, I want you to state your full name and address.” I did. “Now, each of us will state our name and position into the tape recorder.” There were two detectives from the police department, a detective from Customs, and two members of the bomb squad.

Then started the questions. They were easy at first. They asked me where I lived. What do I do for a living? Why am I unemployed? How come it’s taken me 4 months to find a job?

They asked me why I was visiting Canada. I was to visit a friend I met on World of Warcraft, Cara. They took down her name and what I could remember of her address. They asked me how we met.

“In an online game.”
“What online game?”
“Umm … World of Warcraft,” I responded meekly.
“What kind of game is this?”
“It’s a fantasy game … it takes place online.”
“Fantasy … like it’s got wizards and warlocks?”
“Well, it’s got warlocks.” (And they need to be nerfed.)

They asked me to describe my relation to Cara. I told them that people meet up in the game and go on adventures together, and that Cara and I were in a guild together that I was the leader of. They confused the concept of a guild with the game, however, and I had them believing that I was the Lord and Leader of all of WoW until I was able to correct them, and explain to them what a guild was.

So, when they put the pieces together; namely, that I was visiting a female person that I had met over a computer game, their next line of questioning went down an obvious path.

“So you and Cara are friends?”
“Yes.”
“How long have you known her?”
“About 5 months I think? Maybe less.”
“Do you have a romantic relationship with Cara?”
“No.”
“Do you want a romantic relationship with Cara?”
“No.”
“OK, so … if you and Cara were drunk together, and she turned to you and said, ‘Tim, let’s go–’”

I interrupted him. “Excuse me … what’s the point of these questions?” The detective hardened. “Let me make things clear. I ask questions. You answer them. Do we have an understanding?”

“Yes.” I paused. “I just don’t see how this is relevant.”

He spoke right in my face. “I’ve got 5 good men going into that airplane right now. Five of my best bomb squad guys. If there is any reason that I should be concerned for their life, then I need to know now. So just answer the questions, and do as I say.”

Now the questions became really pointed. What do you think about 9/11? What are your views on the Iran issue? Do you think government is too big, too powerful? Would you ever “make a point?”

He asked me if I knew how to make a bomb. “I have a degree in physics, and I’m not an idiot.” Of course I knew how to make a bomb — what kind of question is that?? The better question is, WOULD I make a bomb? The answer is no.

They tried to trap me with some of their questions. I noticed they would try to get me to contradict myself. Like, I had earlier mentioned that I had never met Cara in real life, so they would later nonchalantly ask me when I had last seen Cara. Stuff like that.

He told me there was a similar bomb scare in LA today. He asked me if I was connected with it. He asked me if I was connected to the “liquid” thing from Britain.

Finally, he was done. He and the two bomb squad guys left. The customs lady followed up with more prying personal questions. She asked me more about Cara, how I got to know her, how we interact, etc.

The interviewers would periodically withdraw to talk about me in French, then return with followup questions. I was picked apart by these questions. They wanted to know how I could pay for my ticket, being unemployed, and what my motivations for visiting Cara were. They had me on the defensive the whole time.

She had finished her interview and I was then returned to the garage where they were questioning everyone else on the plane, one by one. I waited for another hour or so as the bomb squad did their thing (I assume). Eventually, they loaded everyone up on the bus to take them to retrieve their stuff. Except me — I and two others were to be inspected by Customs.

They took my photo, asked me to wait in the cold for 30 minutes, and then escorted me to a red van. Along the way I passed the detective who had first interviewed me. He was carrying a green paper bag. He called me over.

“I just got it back from the bomb squad. It’s an iPod. Do you want it back?”
“It’s been in the toilet.”
“Yeah, it’s messy.” Then he walked right up to my ear. “Tim, you’re not in any trouble anymore. Nothing you say now is going to be on record. I want you to answer a question honestly, just for me, not for my agency.”
“OK?”
He whispered into my ear. “Did you … did you take a dump, and then drop your iPod in the toilet on accident?”

“No!” I yelled a little too loudly. “Like I said … I didn’t notice it was missing until after!”

“OK, OK. I believe you. You did great, Tim.”

I got my wallet back and was escorted by police to the van. I waited some more on this van, and finally it took me to a harmless immigration office. I waited some more there, the whole time being watched and followed by police officers. Finally, they escorted me to the baggage claim to fetch my stuff, and took me to a very private room with some bomb-screening equipment and tinted mirrors for windows.

It was me and a gruff, humorless customs official. He unpacked my luggage entirely, ran the contents of my wallet through a bomb sweep, and carefully examined all of my belongings. He then asked me to turn on my laptop. I did, and he began using it. I saw him open Spotlight and begin searching.

“Do you connect to the Internet on this laptop?”
“Yes.”
“Have you downloaded and images?”
“Huh? What do you mean?”
“Do you have any pornography?”
“No.”

I waited in total silence for about 10 minutes as he kept searching and searching, until I finally asked him, “What are you looking for?”

“Contraband,” he said without looking up at me.
“Such as?”
“Child pornography, hate propaganda.”
“Child porn I can understand, that’s illegal. But hate propaganda is protected speech.”
Now he looked up. “What country do you think you’re in?”
“Oh, it’s illegal in Canada?”
“I honestly don’t know. But that doesn’t matter. I get to decide what goes in this country. Do you have a problem with that?”
I paused for a long time while I thought about what I should say to this. “Yes.”
“Yes, you do have a problem?”
“Yes, I do. If it’s illegal in Canada I’ll understand, but saying ‘I don’t want it in my country’ isn’t good enough when you’re a government official.”

Now he was pissed. “Don’t fool around with me. I’m sure you want this to end as much as I do. So I will ask you questions, and you will answer. Do you understand?”

Another long pause while I thought. “Yes, I do.”

He continued his exhaustive audit of my computer’s contents, then returned it to me. We waited for a Customs escort, who showed me out of the room and back to the terminal. There they left me without saying a word, and I was free to go.

O.K. I can’t just leave this story without saying how weird it is. I mean, this poor guy accidently dropped an iPod in a toilet. He was honest about it. It seems to me that those people were out of control, especially the one who thought it was his job to decide what got into his country whether it was legal or not.

But then there’s been a lot of overacting lately, hasn’t there?

  • There were the two men who were removed from the flight to Manchester when the other passengers refused to board the plane out of irrational paranoia due to their appearance and watch checking.
  • A Muslim man and his companions were removed from a Denver flight because he was reciting his prayers.
  • There have been cases of airports being shut down due to false positives for liquid explosives in make up and bottled water.
  • A plane made an emergency landing in Miami because two of the lavatories turned up locked but nothing was found amiss.
  • A flight from London to Washington had to be escorted to Boston by fighter jets after a 59-year old , claustraphobic woman with contraband hand cream and matches had a panic attack and became violent and had to be restrained.
  • And then there were those 12 arrested on that Dutch flight to India for arrousing suspicion with cell phones.

And I’m sure there are more.

I’m not saying that we shouldn’t be vigilant and we shouldn’t be cautious, but we seem to be jumping at every little blip and bleep. How can we tell what the real threats are if we jump at everything?

Here’s a great observation from Bruce Schneier:

The point of terrorism is to cause terror, sometimes to further a political goal and sometimes out of sheer hatred. The people terrorists kill are not the targets; they are collateral damage. And blowing up planes, trains, markets or buses is not the goal; those are just tactics. The real targets of terrorism are the rest of us: the billions of us who are not killed but are terrorized because of the killing. The real point of terrorism is not the act itself, but our reaction to the act.

And we’re doing exactly what the terrorists want.

[…]

Our politicians help the terrorists every time they use fear as a campaign tactic. The press helps every time it writes scare stories about the plot and the threat. And if we’re terrified, and we share that fear, we help. All of these actions intensify and repeat the terrorists’ actions, and increase the effects of their terror.

(I am not saying that the politicians and press are terrorists, or that they share any of the blame for terrorist attacks. I’m not that stupid. But the subject of terrorism is more complex than it appears, and understanding its various causes and effects are vital for understanding how to best deal with it.)

The implausible plots and false alarms actually hurt us in two ways. Not only do they increase the level of fear, but they also waste time and resources that could be better spent fighting the real threats and increasing actual security. I’ll bet the terrorists are laughing at us.

Another thought experiment: Imagine for a moment that the British government arrested the 23 suspects without fanfare. Imagine that the TSA and its European counterparts didn’t engage in pointless airline-security measures like banning liquids. And imagine that the press didn’t write about it endlessly, and that the politicians didn’t use the event to remind us all how scared we should be. If we’d reacted that way, then the terrorists would have truly failed.

It’s time we calm down and fight terror with antiterror. This does not mean that we simply roll over and accept terrorism. There are things our government can and should do to fight terrorism, most of them involving intelligence and investigation — and not focusing on specific plots.

But our job is to remain steadfast in the face of terror, to refuse to be terrorized. Our job is to not panic every time two Muslims stand together checking their watches. There are approximately 1 billion Muslims in the world, a large percentage of them not Arab, and about 320 million Arabs in the Middle East, the overwhelming majority of them not terrorists. Our job is to think critically and rationally, and to ignore the cacophony of other interests trying to use terrorism to advance political careers or increase a television show’s viewership.

The surest defense against terrorism is to refuse to be terrorized. Our job is to recognize that terrorism is just one of the risks we face, and not a particularly common one at that. And our job is to fight those politicians who use fear as an excuse to take away our liberties and promote security theater that wastes money and doesn’t make us any safer.

Tags: , , , ,

August 26th, 2006

News Quickies

  • Former Iraq POW Jessica Lynch is pregnant.  She and her boyfriend, Wes Robinson, are expecting their first child in January. (CNN.com)
  • 43% of Americans believe the United States is now safer from terrorism than it was before September 11, 2001.  25% believe it is less safe.  Over half believe that an act of terrorism will likely happen in the US in the next few weeks, over half believe that the federal government is unprepared for any terrorist attack targeting any U.S. town or city, and over half believe that the federal government is unprepared to deal with the damage from a terrorist attack.  Plus, over 50% believe that the U.S.-led war in Iraq has made the country less safe from terrorism and almost 60% believe that the U.S.-led war in Iraq has made the world less safe from terrorism. (CNN.com)
  • British budget airline Ryanair filed a £3m compensation claim against the British government yesterday due to losses from the new airport security restrictions incorporated two weeks ago that still are resulting in lines so long that they have “spillover tents” outside of two of the terminals. (Guardian Unlimited)
  • “Research in 56 countries found that rates of asthma, hayfever and eczema increased more often than they decreased between 1991 and 2003.” (Guardian Unlimited)
  • A geography teacher was placed on paid administrative on the second day of school for hanging several flags from other countries in his classroom.  Apparently, a Colorado law that makes it illegal to display foreign flags permanently in schools.  How stupid is that?  Why is that law even necessary? (TheDenverChannel.com)

Tags: , , , , , ,

August 25th, 2006

Recommended Reading - 08/25/06

August 22nd, 2006

Lord Of The Flies: The Airline Version

Posted in In the News, The World, Featured by n. mallory

Last Wednesday, in Malaga, Spain, some of the passengers of Monarch Airlines Airbus A320 succummed to irrational terror and forced Monach Airlines to eject two other passengers from the flight based on their own version of racial profiling, even though they had all at that point passed security checks. The problem with the two passengers was that they were both in their early 20s, appeared to be Middle Eastern, and were speaking in a foreign language which the other passengers assumed was Arabic; the passengers noted that despite the heat of Malaga, the two men were wearing leather jackets and thick jumpers and seemed to be checking their watches rather regularly — I don’t know why that part was alarming to anyone as I find everyone in airport is always anxious to get on the plane and watch checking seems to be a regular airport activity.

Initially, six passengers refused to board the flight. On board the aircraft, word reached one family. To the astonishment of cabin crew, they stood up and walked off, followed quickly by others.

The Monarch pilot - a highly experienced captain - accompanied by armed Civil Guard police and airport security staff, approached the two men and took their passports.

Half an hour later, police returned and escorted the two Asian passengers off the jet.

[…]

Soon afterwards, the aircraft was cleared while police did a thorough security sweep. Nothing was found and the plane took off - three hours late and without the two men on board.

Monarch arranged for them to spend the rest of the night in an airport hotel and flew them back to Manchester later on Wednesday.

College lecturer Jo Schofield, her husband Heath and daughters Emily, 15, and Isabel, 12, were caught up in the passenger mutiny.

Mrs Schofield, 38, said: “The plane was not yet full and it became apparent that people were refusing to board. In the gate waiting area, people had been talking about these two, who looked really suspicious with their heavy clothing, scruffy, rough, appearance and long hair.

“Some of the older children, who had seen the terror alert on television, were starting to mutter things like, ‘Those two look like they’re bombers.’

“Then a family stood up and walked off the aircraft. They were joined by others, about eight in all. We learned later that six or seven people had refused to get on the plane.

“There was no fuss or panic. People just calmly and quietly got off the plane. There were no racist taunts or any remarks directed at the men.

“It was an eerie scene, very quiet. The children were starting to ask what was going on. We tried to play it down.”

Mr Schofield, 40, an area sales manager, said: “When the men were taken off they didn’t argue or say a word. They just picked up their coats and obeyed the police. They seemed resigned to the fact they were under suspicion.

“The captain and crew were very apologetic when we were asked to evacuate the plane for the security search. But there was no dissent.

“While we were waiting, everyone agreed the men looked dodgy. Some passengers were very panicky and in tears. There was a lot of talking about terrorists.”

Patrick Mercer, the Tory Homeland Security spokesman, said last night: “This is a victory for terrorists. These people on the flight have been terrorised into behaving irrationally.

“For those unfortunate two men to be victimised because of the colour of their skin is just nonsense.”

Monarch said last night: “The captain was concerned about the security surrounding the two gentlemen on the aircraft and the decision was taken to remove them from the flight for further security checks.

“The two passengers offloaded from the flight were later cleared by airport security and rebooked to travel back to Manchester on a later flight.” [”Mutiny as passengers refuse to fly until Asians are removed”(Daily Mail)]

Mercer is right. However, it’s not the terrorists who created the victory; it’s the fear-mongerers who created it. If we had more assurances from the British and American governments and airport securities that we really are safer now than we were and if our President wasn’t on the television basically saying “Muslims are bad! You should fear Muslims Only I can protect you from the scary Muslims!” Maybe this sort of thing wouldn’t be starting to happen.

Oh, but you say, that didn’t happen here in America? It wouldn’t happen here in America?

Well, I’m glad you brought that up, because last Tuesday Dr. Ahmed Farooq of Winnipeg was escorted off a United Airlines plane in Denver after a drunk passenger made allegations of suspicious behaviour when he was reciting his evening prayers.

When flight personnel were alerted, the 27-year-old radiology resident and two colleagues — a man and a woman — were taken off their flight. They had been returning from a conference in San Francisco.

Farooq said that even officials from the Transportation Security Administration soon realized the flight crew had overreacted, but by the time that conclusion had been reached the trio were forced to stay in Denver for the night and catch a flight the next day — at their own expense. “There’s no recourse,” Farooq said. “There’s no way to really be able to talk to anybody to really be able to reason it out. The police officers who talked to me afterwards and subsequent officials within the first three to five minutes, they were like, ‘You know what? The crew made a mistake. We apologize that they took you off. They overreacted.’”

Brandon Borrman of United Airlines told the Winnipeg Free Press this week that the airline is obliged to take any allegations threatening passenger safety seriously, particularly in the wake of last week’s arrests in the alleged bomb plot on flights from Britain to the U.S.

“Whenever these types of claims are made we have a duty to investigate,” Borrman said. “Our flight crews are trained to make safety the No. 1 priority.” [”Muslim doctor wants apology from U.S. airline” (CBS News)]

Dr. Ahmed Farooq is demanding an official appology and compensation from United Airlines.

You should at least note that the British airline had the decency to not only admit they were overreacting at the time and compensate the passengers for the that they had to get off the flight, stay the night and get another flight the next day.

These people are people. They’re just trying to get from A to B like you and me. They’re on business trips, visiting family, on vacation, etc. They’re just as worried, scared, annoyed as you. Only now they have the added worry that you’re going to come after them as a lynch mob just because of the color of their skin or the language they speak or the religion they choose.

Aren’t we above that yet? Or are we ready to turn our country over to the KKK and other haters and let them have control until only the “right” kind of people are left so we know who to trust?

But wait! There’s more!

raed we will not be silent t-shirtRaed Jarrar, the Iraqi Project Director for the human rights group Global Exchange, was stopped at JFK airport wearing a t-shirt with the words in Arabic and English, “We Will Not Be Silent.” (The man in the picture is not Raed Jarrar, but this is the shirt he was wearing.) He was told by agents at the airport he would not be permitted to board the plane wearing that t-shirt because of its message. Jarrar’s story, from his blog Raed in the Middle:

At around 8:30, two men approached me while I was checking my phone. One of them asked me if I had a minute and he showed me his badge, I said: “sure”. We walked some few steps and stood in front of the boarding counter where I found out that they were accompanied by another person, a woman from Jet Blue.

One of the two men who approached me first, Inspector Harris, asked for my id card and boarding pass. I gave him my boarding pass and driver’s license. He said “people are feeling offended because of your t-shirt”. I looked at my t-shirt: I was wearing my shirt which states in both Arabic and English “we will not be silent”…. I said “I am very sorry if I offended anyone, I didnt know that this t-shirt will be offensive”. He asked me if I had any other T-shirts to put on, and I told him that I had checked in all of my bags and I asked him “why do you want me to take off my t-shirt? Isn’t it my constitutional right to express myself in this way?” The second man in a greenish suit interfered and said “people here in the US don’t understand these things about constitutional rights”. So I answered him “I live in the US, and I understand it is my right to wear this t-shirt.”

Then I once again asked the three of them : “How come you are asking me to change my t-shirt? Isn’t this my constitutional right to wear it? I am ready to change it if you tell me why I should. Do you have an order against Arabic t-shirts? Is there such a law against Arabic script?” so inspector Harris answered “you can’t wear a t-shirt with Arabic script and come to an airport. It is like wearing a t-shirt that reads “I am a robber” and going to a bank”. I said “but the message on my t-shirt is not offensive, it just says “we will not be silent”…. Inspector Harris said: “We cant make sure that your t-shirt means we will not be silent, we don’t have a translator. Maybe it means something else”. I said: “But as you can see, the statement is in both Arabic and English”. He said “maybe it is not the same message”. So based on the fact that Jet Blue doesn’t have a translator, anything in Arabic is suspicious because maybe it’ll mean something bad!…

inspector Harris said: “You don’t have to take of your t-shirt, just put it on inside-out”. I refused to put on my shirt inside-out. So the woman interfered and said “let’s reach a compromise. I will buy you a new t-shirt and you can put it on on top of this one”. I said “I want to keep this t-shirt on”. Both inspector Harris and Mr. Harmon said “No, we can’t let you get on that airplane with your t-shirt”. I said “I am ready to put on another t-shirt if you tell me what is the law that requires such a thing. I want to talk to your supervisor”. Inspector Harris said “You don’t have to talk to anyone. Many people called and complained about your t-shirt. Jetblue customers were calling before you reached the checkpoint, and costumers called when you were waiting here in the boarding area”.

it was then that I realized that my t-shirt was the reason why I had been taken to the secondary checking.

I asked the four people again to let me talk to any supervisor, and they refused.

The Jet Blue woman was asking me again to end this problem by just putting on a new t-shirt, and I felt threatened by Mr. Harmon’s remarks as in “Let’s end this the nice way”. Taking in consideration what happens to other Arabs and Muslims in US airports, and realizing that I will miss my flight unless I covered the Arabic script on my t-shirt as I was told by the four agents, I asked the Jet Blue woman to buy me a t-shirt and I said “I don’t want to miss my flight.”

She asked, what kind of t-shirts do you like. Should I get you an “I heart new york t-shirt?”. So Mr. Harmon said “No, we shouldn’t ask him to go from one extreme to another”. I asked mr. harmon why does he assume I hate new york if I had some Arabic script on my t-shirt, but he didn’t answer.

The woman went away for 3 minutes, and she came back with a gray t-shirt reading “new york”. I put the t-shirt on and removed the price tag. I told the four people who were involved in the conversation: “I feel very sad that my personal freedom was taken away like this. I grew up under authoritarian governments in the Middle East, and one of the reasons I chose to move to the US was that I don’t want an officer to make me change my t-shirt. I will pursue this incident today through a Constitutional rights organization, and I am sure we will meet soon”. Everyone said okay and left, and I went back to my seat.

This is what they’re trying with someone who knows his constitutional rights under the First Amendment. What will they try with someone else?

Mr. Jarrar has filed a complaint through the ACLU against JetBlue. He would like to file a complaint against the government agents involved, but was unable to ascertain from which agency they hailed. Jarrar is asking that people call JetBlue at 1-800-JETBLUE (538-2583), or leave a complaint via an online form. My complaint via the form:

I am dismayed by the case of Raed Jarrar. What is jetBlue doing keeping people off flights for wearing t-shirts that state “We Will Not Be Silenced?” A t-shirt is not a weapon of mass destruction. Please apologize to Mr. Jarrar and consult your United States Constitution. See especially Amendment #1.

A message on a t-shirt is not a weapon of mass destruction. Freedom begins to die when the authorities pull this shit and nobody complains. So thank you, Raed Jarrar, for speaking out and making a fuss about it. Those of us who are more comfortably situated than he would do well to raise a fuss as well. [“T-shirt of Mass Destruction?” (Irregular Times)]

Is this really what we want? To live in fear? To live as racists? To condemn each other based on race and religion? Such stupid wars were fought over religion and race and what came of it in the past? In the end, we are all flesh and blood. We live; we die; we breath; we feel.

Recommended Reading:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

August 18th, 2006

What’s Good Enough For The President Isn’t Good Enough For Us Common Citizens

The Boston Globe reports that the technology to detect liquid explosives is already available and, in fact, the White House and the Supreme Court are already using such equipment known as SmartCheck, a low-intensity X-ray scanner made by AS&E that “can spot a bottle of organic compounds in a passenger’s pocket.” That’s pretty impressive actually considering all the people who end up on airplanes with all sorts of things they aren’t supposed to. However,

The TSA has not outfitted airports with the devices, in part, because officials have to prioritize where they spend limited dollars, according to Frank Cilluffo, former special assistant to President Bush for homeland security and now director of George Washington University’s Homeland Security Policy Institute.

Meanwhile, while Bush and his staff were sure of their safety, this year the Bush administration was secretly seeking permission from Congress to divert $6 million that was supposed to be spent developing new homeland explosives detection technology — technology that would protect the rest of America from those terrorists President Bush is always warning us to be afraid of.

What I really don’t understand is why we aren’t focusing on the technology we do have and distributing it to the airports we have where terrorists might think to try sneaking bombs and weapons and liquid and non-liquid explosives in. I mean SmartCheck has been around since some time in the 1990s. Just think about if something like that had been in place on September 11, 2001.

The Transportation Security Administration, the federal agency in charge of airport security, is testing products from American Science and Engineering Inc. of Billerica; Ahura Corp. of Wilmington; and General Dielectric Inc. of Acton.

AS&E’s SmartCheck system uses low-powered X-rays to scan passengers for hidden items like bottles of liquid, while Ahura and General Dielectric use lasers or microwaves respectively, to identify the contents of a sealed bottle. The TSA is also testing seven other devices made by companies in the United States, the United Kingdom , and Japan. But TSA spokeswoman Amy Kudwa says that none are ready to be deployed because of reliability and feasibility issues.

But after this month’s foiled terrorist plot to smuggle liquid explosives aboard jumbo jets, the government may not have the luxury to wait. Charles Slepian , founder of the Foreseeable Risk Analysis Center, a transportation security firm in New York, said that technology for detecting explosives in carry-on bags is well understood and readily available, but the US Department of Homeland Security is reluctant to spend the large sums needed to deploy it at hundreds of airports.

So, which is it? Is the equipment unreliable? Or does it have to do with how much money they’d have to spend? Let’s think about it.

It’s reliable enough to use at The White House. They wouldn’t risk the President’s life, would they?

So it must be all that money they’d have to spend. That’s money they could use funding the war in Iraq. After all, it’s hard to fund things when you keep insisting on cutting back on taxes. You can’t pay for the important things like protecting the country if you don’t have any money coming in.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

August 12th, 2006

Recommended Reading — Terror in the Skies Edition

WTF?

August 11th, 2006

This Is Airport Security?

Posted in In the News, The World, 9-11 & Terrorism by n. mallory

O.K. Really I’ve been trying not to comment on the “Terror in the Sky” thing — this is the name Fox News has given the latest terrorist plot the U.K. foiled as of yesterday. I’ve been waiting for more facts to unfold before jumping to any conclusions or opinions, though I will admit that I have had my moments of cynicism like any self-professed liberal.

However, the obsurdity that this post points out…just couldn’t go by without comment.

liquidshittier.jpgO.K. I get that for security reasons the U.S. and the U.K. wants to ban liquids and gel-like substances on airplanes because the terrorst plot was to mix substances that could then become explosive. That makes sense though it doesn’t make me all too thrilled — as a slightish germaphobe, I like having my own little bottle of familiar diet soda in my backpack, which I’ve always happily put through the x-ray machine and I prefer to carry a small bottle of that hand gel stuff for germ killing and since my luggage is usually lost, I like bringing my toothpaste, but I’m really kind of o.k. with leaving that stuff at home for national security.

liquidshit.jpgHowever, apparently, security in some locations has been having people not only throw away their liquid items but pour them out into trash cans… mixing the liquids with other liquids other people have already poured out.

Does anyone else see a problem with this?

I mean, if the liquids are too dangerous to bring on airplanes packed with people because if they’re potentially explosive when mixed with other liquids… how safe is it to be mixing them in a trash can in an airport packed with people?

Is this really logical? I mean, hello?!

Tags: , , ,

July 12th, 2006

Tripping in the UK [Part I]

Posted in My Life, Friends & Family, Featured, Vacation, UK 2006 by n. mallory

Well, the first sign of any trouble occurred when I reached the Boston airport. Somewhere between the bus from Portland and security, I lost my nifty really soft travel pillow. Logan airport’s security and Lost and found were extremely unhelpful and rude and ended up giving me a long distance number to call, which I’ve since lost. Hard to believe that lost and found is a long distance phone number.

So, my first expense on the trip was at the Logan airport buying a new one at the Brookstone kiosk (and they wouldn’t give me a discount for loyalty either ;) ).

Interestingly, the International terminal was the dreariest airport terminal I’d ever been in and had the least number of distractions I’d ever seen. (Little did I know, that this is apparently the norm overseas. Apparently only we Americans truly need to be entertained while waiting on the next plane.)

The seat in front of mine on the long flight over was broken and stuck in the laid back position. Fortunately, there was no one next to me to my right, so I moved over. Still, it annoyed me the whole time, especially when the man was offered a seat that wasn’t broken and after take off, he returned to the broken one. It also annoyed me that this family of five seemed to take over our section of the plane and kept changing seats and getting up and such. Only one or two of them had tickets for our area and they even comandeered my old seat. I don’t mind if you trade, but I do mind if you are inconsiderate of everyone else. Especially since it was a night flight.

I had some troubles with my legs spasming on the long flight over. There just wasn’t enough space to stretch them out and one of the stewards got snippy with me w