October 10th, 2006
I am a Pro-Choicer. I believe in the right to choose. I’ll just state that out in the open. You won’t change my mind on that.
And not that it’s any of your business but I’ve never had an abortion nor do I expect to. I also have no children nor do I plan to.
However, I do have many questions about the Pro-Life/Anti-Abortion view. Mind you, I don’t expect to change your mind either. I’m just curious and interested in a two-way discussion. All (non-hateful) views are welcome.
I find that once I start thinking about the whole when-is-a-baby-a-life debate, I’m just as confused as most anyone. I mean, there’s no evidence as to when exactly a fetus becomes “a living being with a soul”. I’ve read and heard all sorts of debates on the subject.
There’s the thought that a being becomes “a life with a soul” upon conception, but “as many as 50% of all pregnancies end in miscarriage — most often before a woman misses a menstrual period or even knows she is pregnant. About 15% of recognized pregnancies will end in a miscarriage. More than 80% of miscarriages occur within the first three months of pregnancy.” [“Understanding Miscarriages” (WebMD)] If that’s true, wouldn’t it make more sense that a “soul” wouldn’t make permanent residency until after that 3rd month, just in case.
For me, I often think of my brain or mind as connected with my “soul” — I know, symbollically it’s supposed to be your heart — so I looked it up, and while the brain starts to develop in week 3 after conception, it’s not until the 2nd Trimester that brain waves are detectable and it’s not until the 3rd Trimester that there’s rapid brain development and the baby is strong enough that it might survive if born early, though the chances of complications and death are high. [Prenatal Development]
So, for me, I think it would have to be in one of those steps. Maybe.
I guess I really don’t know. I’m not the Creator of Life after all.
Anyway, I guess that’s why I don’t want to make a decision for anyone else as to whether or not she should or shouldn’t be able to have an abortion or where to draw the line. I don’t think you should kill living beings. I think a living being is someone who could survive on his or her own, given the chance, but I guess that’s not the right answer either since there are certainly a whole lot of people of many ages who suffer a whole lot of maladies and injuries who would die without the care of others. We wouldn’t leave our grandparents to die just because they can’t survive on their own or soldiers injured in war.
Then again, I wouldn’t want to ask a woman whose life is at risk to carry a baby to full term or a woman who’s been raped to carry such a heavy reminder of her victimization for nine months or a young teenager who’s almost a baby herself to carry the child of her incestuous father.
I wouldn’t want to refuse anyone her right to make her personal choice whatever it may be. In the end, she’ll answer to God or Buddha or herself, but it’s not my place to judge her. I have so many of my own choices to weigh on my shoulders.
But I keep coming back to some inconsistencies in various arguments. I don’t understand the people who honestly and truly believe that life begins at conception and that with that life comes a “soul” and that it is a sin to abort that life; it is murder. To believe so extreme and completely is one thing. That I can understand, but then to say, that you want to pass a law making this sin illegal with the exception of rape, incest and danger to health…do two sins make a right?
Tags: abortion, pro-choice, anti-abortion, pro-life
September 4th, 2006
Women’s Rights
- Class warfare at Starbucks — lambert @ CorrenteWire writes about how class warfare starts over breast milk. Companies are far more likely to be accomodating to executive mothers who need breaks during the day to pump breast milk, but the women who work in the stores and “on the line” have to “barricade themselves in small restrooms intended for customers, counting the minutes left in their breaks.” There’s a lot of pressure to breast-feed in this day and age, but it’s easy to get discouraged and give up under less than ideal conditions.
- A Mystery From the Time When Abortion Was Illegal and Dangerous — olvlzl @ ECHIDNE OF THE SNAKES remembers a horrible, deadly practice from the pre-Roe era — infanticide.
The woman who owned the trunk was in her 60s in 1983. The papers say she was called a “pillar of the community” when she lived in the area. People who remembered her said that at the time the babies had been killed she often appeared to be pregnant but she never had children. The authorities found her but she wouldn’t say anything about the trunk. I don’ t know of any legal pressure put on her to talk. The fact that there were five corpses of infants wrapped in newspapers from different years certainly suggests serial infanticide, not a misdemeanor in anyone’s book.
More
Tags: Starbucks, Women's Rights, breastfeeding, class warfare, abortion, baby snuffer, infancticide, Islamofascism, propaganda, War on Terror, WWII, Osama bin Laden, Donald Rumsfeld, Iraq, Domino Theory, Hitler, whistleblowers, Russell Tice, Defense Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, Department of Justice, 101st Fighting Keyboarders, Fox News, David Warren, Debbie Schussel, Kathleen Parker, Mark Steyn, Glenn Greenwald, hypocrisy
March 7th, 2006
There’s a lot of hoopla about the abortion fight lately. There’s a lot of name-calling and word-twisting going around. It’s almost dangerous to join into a conversation and express your opinion because the truth is very few people are 100% extremely for or against abortion and the people in the middle are in a mosh pit of sorts.
The Blogsphere, especially the feminist-leaning ’sphere, is filled with a whirlwind of terms and phrases — War Against Women, Women-Haters, Women-Opressers, Pro-choicers, Pro-lifers, Anti-abortionist, Anti-lifers. Personally, I’m not fond of the “pro-life” and “anti-life” versions as they really don’t reflect the groups labeled as such. I think “pro-choice” and “anti-abortion” are probably the best fits I’ve heard or read so far.
More
Tags: pro-choice, anti-abortion, abortion, War on Women, Women's Rights
March 2nd, 2006
A recent study suggests that safe sex leads to less unintended pregnancies which leads to less abortions. (Duh.) It also suggests that when the government reduces funding for family planning or birth control to poor women and teenagers, unintended pregnancies and therefore abortions go up. Huh.
At a time when policymakers have made reducing unintended pregnancies a national priority, 33 states have made it more difficult or more expensive for poor women and teenagers to obtain contraceptives and related medical services, according to an analysis released yesterday by the nonpartisan Guttmacher Institute.
From 1994 to 2001, many states cut funds for family planning, enacted laws restricting access to birth control and placed tight controls on sex education, said the institute…
[…]
“The most powerful and least divisive way to decrease abortion is to reduce unintended pregnancy,” said Sarah Brown, director of the nonpartisan National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. “If we can make progress reducing unintended pregnancy, we can make enormous progress reducing abortion.”
More
Tags: safe sex, abortion, family planning, birth control
March 1st, 2006
MJS at Corrente writes that, in view of recent proposals that would hand over ownership of women’s lady parts to the state, a terminology change is in order. The Jivester suggests that rather than using the negative “anti-choice” label for those who not only want to force unwanted pregnancy on all females, including rape and incest victims, but also to thwart access to emergency contraception and, yes, even the good ol’ birth control pill, we instead accentuate the positive and call this new confiscatory policy what it is: a War on Women (WOW).
May this latest US declaration of hostility be as successful as the War on Poverty, the War on Drugs, and the War on Terror have been. [The War on Women: A Modest Proposal (Tennessee Guerilla Women]
More
Tags: Quote of the Day, Women's Rights, birth control, War on Women, abortion, unwanted pregnancy
June 29th, 2005
I don’t understand what’s going on in our country right now. I just don’t get how the Religious Right can be campaigning so adamantly about making abortion illegal and keeping gays and lesbians from marrying each other and all the while spouting Bible verses as their reasons; yet there is also a strong movement in this country to have The Ten Commandments removed from public courthouses because of separation of Church and State. If we’re so interested in keeping our Church and State separate, why are legislators trying to pass laws that affect other people’s lives based on their own personal religious beliefs?
I just don’t get it. This world seems more and more illogical and contradictory by the day.
Tags: abortion, Gay Rights, Christian Zealots, politics
October 13th, 2004
I’ve been thinking about some odd contradictions in Bush’s position on four subjects. It seems very hypocritical to me.
- Bush is against stem cell research because he doesn’t want to destroy lives to save lives. In other words, he doesn’t want to destroy unwanted fetuses to save the lives of people who are in need.
- Bush is anti-abortion, which is why he believes the above.
- Bush is pro-capital punishment. It’s ok to kill murderers and evil-doers. Apparently not all life is sacred.
- Bush is o.k. with destroying the lives of American soldiers, Iraqi rebels, and innocent Iraqi citizens, including children, as long as it’s to protect our freedom and to spread democracy.
Apparently the only sacred life is the unborn life. After all, all those unborn fetuses are going to be needed to fight our wars and pay our debts in the future.
Tags: George W. Bush, stem cell research, anti-abortion, pro-captial punishment, politics
June 30th, 2004
Talking politics is a quick way to make friends and enemies these days. Personally, I have tried not to discuss politics or religion in my journals or with my friends “back home”. For the most part I discovered that some people tend to take both subjects way too personally and feel the fanatical need to convert everyone they know to the “right” way of thinking which is of course always their way. Some of my friends “back home” had a penchant for getting into loud, angry, pissing matches over politics, religion, and sometimes even books and movies and while I enjoy a good debate, I don’t like shouting matches or banging my head against a wall.
For the most part, many people either make up their minds and cling to those opinions no matter what the facts or opinions of others or they do as their parents or spouses do and believe what their parents or spouses believe. Sometimes both options play a part. Unfortunately many people never let exeriences or newly learned facts to change their opinions; they cling to the belief that they are right despite everything.
Some of my friends “back home” are like that which is why I don’t allow such topics on the mailing list we all use to keep track of each other. People become too easily offended, emails fly back and forth because people are offended or they want to force others to see things their way. It’s all very unpleasant and sad.
I like to keep an open-mind. I won’t say that I don’t think I’m right. I just admit that I could be wrong. In fact, it wouldn’t surprise me. In fact, my opinions on many things have changed over the last 33 years. Things I believed in with all my heart when I was a teenager have proven themselves not true or have become questionable as my experiences and new facts have reared their ugly heads. I may still be a bit naive. I may still not understand every facet of everything going on in the world, but at the very least I have an open-mind and I accept when I’m wrong and I find talking, debating with others either strengthens my beliefs or changes them.
I think it’s a sign of a mature individual…though I don’t know that I’m all that mature or that I’m even mentally healthy at times. 
So, I’ve come to enjoy in my new life the ability to have mature, adult conversations about politics with people here and people I’ve met online — people who don’t just shout rhetoric back and forth and people who have a clue not only about what is going on in the world but don’t believe everything they hear or read.
So, here is my political stance for those of you who are interested:
- I have voted for every President who has been in office since I started voting at 18 years old — I’m 33 now.
- I have been registered as a Republican, a Democrat, and an Independent at various times in my life. Currently, I am registered as a Democrat though 3 months ago I was an Independent.
- I have never believed that we should invade Iraq. I never thought they had weapons of mass destruction last year. I can’t believe the Bush Administration keeps insisting that is why were are there. I don’t know why other countries who do indeed have weapons of mass destruction have been left to their own devices. I believe we were lied to and if we weren’t lied to then the Bush Administration can’t admit they made an error in judgement and I don’t know which is worse.
- I was for invading Afghanistan but very disappointed that Bush didn’t finish the job.
- I am offended that Bush doesn’t think the outsourcing of American jobs to other countries is an issue. The companies might be saving money but they aren’t passing along that savings to the unemployed masses.
- I am offended that Bush’s administration thinks that the 1.25 million jobs they “created” in the last few months should quell the rising voices when the jobs that have been created are not equivallent in skill or money to the ones that millions of Americans have lost over the last 4 years.
- I am horrified that Bush wants to change the law to keep Americans who love each other from any kind of union, whether you call it a marriage or not, and the rights and benefits such a union should have.
- I am against abortion but believe it’s not my place to tell anyone they can’t have one for whatever reason.
- I am against the draft.
- I am against any merge of church and state and yet Bush’s administration is constantly dragging religion into their politics.
- Bush’s administration scares the hell out of me. I really believe they are out of control and believe that they are too powerful to be ruled by the laws, standards, and beliefs they hold everyone else to.
- It scares me to talk to people who still believe there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. It scares me to listen to people who swear by every word that comes out of Bush’s mouth.
- It scares me that people still think there was a connection between Sadaam and 9/11. I never thought there was and it makes me sick to think that propaganda was used and so widely believed.
- It scares me that people don’t realize that some of those prisoners in those Iraqi prisons were innocent bystanders who were arrested by accident, tortured and humiliated, and even killed. People were killed in inhumane and compassionless ways and yet we are justified because other people that look like them caused 9/11 and other people who look like them have been killing hostages in the Middle East — ironically, the terrorists weren’t in Iraq before we arrived and opened the door but their presence now is used as a reason why we invaded…
- I am afraid of the Homeland Security and the Big Brother concept that it is.
- I am afraid that the terrorists have won by causing us to step closer to losing the freedoms they hate us for.
Tags: politics, dysfunctional drama, George W. Bush, outsourcing, Afghanistan, Gay Rights, abortion, pro-choice, WMD, innocent, detainees, Homeland Security, Terrorists
