Consider the freefall rate “collapses” of the Twin Towers and practically unscathed WTC # 7 building; how is it possible for the uppermost floors to pass through the remainder of the building as quickly (meaning as effortlessly) as passing through air? Common sense tells you that the remainder of the building is going to offer much MUCH greater resistance than air, so exactly how is this possible without explosives? Quick answer: It is not. Without explosives a freefall rate “collapse” or anything anywhere NEAR freefall rate would not be possible by the laws of physics. Also think about the uniform rate at which they “collapsed”, again defying physics unless explosives are used, because as the top part crashes into each floor below it, it would shed more and more energy each time, and slow down, NOT remain a uniform rate. Again, it only takes common sense to see that.

Then consider that the world’s most expensive and high-tech Air Force was completely impotent on one particular day, the very day they were needed the most, when every other time before and since, when airliners deviate from their flight plan fighter planes were scrambled and off their wing in a few minutes… because that is standard operating procedure, done as a reflex…. But not on 9/11. And what a “coincidence” that the “terrorists” decided to attack on the very same day when the Air Force was conducting at least seven separate wargames…. And the same day the C.I.A. and N.S.A. and several other agencies ALSO were having exercises…. Including F.E.M.A. who had a medical triage center set up in Manhattan on 10th Sept., all ready for the next day’s events…. If this doesn’t smell fishy to you then your olifactory glands must not be working.

Then consider that the Pentagon, well-equipped with surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) did not fire even one in its own defense. Not one. Also, the “airliner” that hit it circled around to strike the side that was farthest away from Rumsfeld and the top brass. The side hit had just before 9/11 been reinforced so a fire there wouldn’t spread elsewhere in the building. The side hit was under renovation at the time so it had a lot less military personnel present. Also remember the high G-force corkscrew diving turn made by the “airliner” in its descent to strike the Pentagon, maneuvers a real airliner is not able to do, which is why the FAA air traffic controllers were convinced it was a fighter jet and not an airliner. Also, it was hit on the first floor, but yet the “airliner” did not drag its engines on the lawn which would have happened had it been a real airliner hitting the first floor of the Pentagon. Also, there were no wings, no tail section, no fuselage on the lawn. The original hole in the wall was way too small, plenty of photographs show this. And within minutes of the crash, the F.B.I. confiscates the tapes from 3 civilian security camaras pointed at the crash area, and the tapes have never been seen since. Further, with dozens of camaras on the Pentagon itself that were pointed at the crash site, how come we STILL have not seen even one video showing an airliner crashing into the Pentagon? The badly doctored clip shown on the news not long ago only shows the nose of something and then they literally said “And in the next frame the plane disappears, and then we see the explosion”. This is outrageously laughable. If a jumbo jet crashed into the Pentagon there should be no shortage of video footage that will show it. By them NOT showing us this proves unequivically that there IS NO video footage showing a jumbo jet for us to see because what crashed into the Pentagon was most certainly NOT a jumbo jet (most likely it was a remotely-flown A-3 Skywarrior aircraft, much smaller).

Then there is the Naudet brothers’ ameteur footage of something a lot smaller than a Boeing 757 crashing into the North Tower, to date the only known footage of the North Tower crash. Again, it looks like an A-3 Skywarrior, but certainly not a jumbo jet.

Then there is the little matter of the impossibility of cell phone calls going through from cruising altitude as per the “Flight that fought back” fairy tale. An experiment called Achilles was done that proved what anyone who knows anything about cell phones already knew, that cell phone calls from cruising altitude, or anywhere even near it, are not possible. In fact, beyond 8,000 ft. it is extremely unlikely even one call will go through, and increasing the altitude soon makes it impossible to connect. But the “official” myth has them making over FIFTEEN cell phone calls from about 29,000 feet. Simply put, this is impossible.

Then you have Bush being told by Andy Card that there had been a second crash at the WTC, which meant everyone would have had to assume it was NO accident, and thus, that Bush might be a possible target. So his Secret Service should have immediately whisked him away from Booker Elementary. But instead, Bush was allowed to stay at that school for over 35 minutes, meaning one thing: Bush’s Secret Service chief had to have known Bush was in no danger there because he was not a possible target on 9/11; and the only way he could have known this is if he and Bush knew the 9/11 plans beforehand, meaning it had to have been an inside job. Otherwise there is no reason in this world for them to let Bush stay in that school for 35 seconds after learning of the second crash, let alone 35 minutes.

Then consider that the four flight manifests had NO Arab names on them. Not even one. But yet, one of the “terrorists’” passports was “found” a couple days later near Ground Zero…. meaning not only did it “survive” the “intense fire” and “collapse” of the tower it was in, but also meaning that it was used to board the plane or else why would the “hijacker” have “brought” it along???

Then you have record amounts of short-selling of stock of United Airlines, American Airlines and Morgan Stanley- Dean Witter in a few days before 9/11, certainly done by people who knew the stock on those three companies was going to plummet very soon.

Then you have forewarning of important individuals like Willie Brown and some top generals to avoid flying on 9/11 and to avoid the WTC.

These plus many, MANY more things all point to one unavoidable conclusion: 9/11 was an inside job done by our own government. I understand that this is painful and scary, but the truth often is. Painful and scary does NOT however = false. It is time for any of us clinging to the myth of the “19 hijackers” to wake up, and grow up and be adults, and face the facts. The “official” story is a MYTH. It is as impossible as if they came right out and said the “hijackers” used magical powers, because that is what one would have to believe they had in order to stand down their enemy’s Air Force and make skyscrapers defy physics. The truth may be scary, but it is still better for us in the long run to face it instead of hiding from it and believing an impossible myth.

I’m not completely discounting what you’re saying, I just think that that’s a lot of things that would have had to involve a lot of people and it’s hard to keep that many mouths shut for that long.