<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#34;Newest&#34; Downing Street Memo</title>
	<link>http://nmallory.exit-23.net/20060328/the-newest-downing-street-memo</link>
	<description>&#038; Other Discombobulated Thoughts</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://nmallory.exit-23.net/20060328/the-newest-downing-street-memo#comment-1946</link>
		<author>Big Dog</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nmallory.exit-23.net/20060328/the-newest-downing-street-memo#comment-1946</guid>
					<description>Hussein was shooting at our planes for years which was a breach so why invent a UN plane?  We thought about assassinating Hussein in the first Gulf, probably should have.

Don't know if the memos are real or not and at this point it does not matter.  But I can't imagine Bush and Blair would be careless enough to put that kind of stuff in writing.

Where were the memos 3 years ago?  The NYT is a liberal publication that has invented plenty of stories so even if they tell the truth no one believes them.  Jason Blair?  Two retractions last week....  The weapons cache story that was 18 months old a week before the election.

They are NOT biased and are NOT out to get Bush...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hussein was shooting at our planes for years which was a breach so why invent a UN plane?  We thought about assassinating Hussein in the first Gulf, probably should have.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know if the memos are real or not and at this point it does not matter.  But I can&#8217;t imagine Bush and Blair would be careless enough to put that kind of stuff in writing.</p>
<p>Where were the memos 3 years ago?  The NYT is a liberal publication that has invented plenty of stories so even if they tell the truth no one believes them.  Jason Blair?  Two retractions last week&#8230;.  The weapons cache story that was 18 months old a week before the election.</p>
<p>They are NOT biased and are NOT out to get Bush&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n. mallory</title>
		<link>http://nmallory.exit-23.net/20060328/the-newest-downing-street-memo#comment-1948</link>
		<author>n. mallory</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nmallory.exit-23.net/20060328/the-newest-downing-street-memo#comment-1948</guid>
					<description>The thing is that the Downing Street Memos have been out for over a year and haven't been covered in the U.S. press until the &lt;em&gt;NY Times&lt;/em&gt; and as we've both said, who's going to believe them?  They've been covered in the British news, but of  course, we can't have them mentioned over here on this side of the pond.

Of course, after I wrote this post, I saw the Downing Street memos mentioned on CNN, so maybe they're starting to trickle out into MSM.  Still it's old news and a lot of liberals are wondering why it took so long.  I'm still wondering why no one's ever hear about Cyrus Kar, another innocent American detainee, who's story got supressed from MSM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is that the Downing Street Memos have been out for over a year and haven&#8217;t been covered in the U.S. press until the <em>NY Times</em> and as we&#8217;ve both said, who&#8217;s going to believe them?  They&#8217;ve been covered in the British news, but of  course, we can&#8217;t have them mentioned over here on this side of the pond.</p>
<p>Of course, after I wrote this post, I saw the Downing Street memos mentioned on CNN, so maybe they&#8217;re starting to trickle out into MSM.  Still it&#8217;s old news and a lot of liberals are wondering why it took so long.  I&#8217;m still wondering why no one&#8217;s ever hear about Cyrus Kar, another innocent American detainee, who&#8217;s story got supressed from MSM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://nmallory.exit-23.net/20060328/the-newest-downing-street-memo#comment-1951</link>
		<author>Big Dog</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 01:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nmallory.exit-23.net/20060328/the-newest-downing-street-memo#comment-1951</guid>
					<description>The DSM has been in the press.  I read it and heard about it a year ago.  It was a flash in the pan issue or competing with some other supposed scandal (maybe Plame)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DSM has been in the press.  I read it and heard about it a year ago.  It was a flash in the pan issue or competing with some other supposed scandal (maybe Plame)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
