Comments on: Feingold Takes A Stand http://nmallory.exit-23.net/20060312/feingold-takes-a-stand & Other Discombobulated Thoughts Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:16:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3 By: Big Dog http://nmallory.exit-23.net/20060312/feingold-takes-a-stand#comment-1806 Big Dog Sun, 12 Mar 2006 21:10:05 +0000 http://nmallory.exit-23.net/20060312/feingold-takes-a-stand#comment-1806 Don't you think that they should determine if it was illegal before they censure? I know it was not and the Congress knows it was not but the donks get off calling it illegal so they can beat it into the sheeple of America who don't have enough intelligence to get information themselves. They can't help it, public schools. Feingold is a valiant man. Why, the way he acted in such a partisan manner toward Judge Alito. No matter what anyone thinks about Alito, he is more than qualified for the job and has forgotten more about law than Feingold knows, but that did not stop Russ from acting like a spoiled child. Feingold's call for censure is what got him added to the Jackass of the month poll at my site. He has stiff competition though so he might not win. Now if they actually found that Bush were guilty of something then it might be a different story. Feingold is executing payback. Andrew Jackson was the only President that impeachment proceedings were levied against until Clinton and that same Jackson was the only President to ever have a censure. It is a game that Feingold hopes will help into the White House in 2008. Fat chance. Don’t you think that they should determine if it was illegal before they censure? I know it was not and the Congress knows it was not but the donks get off calling it illegal so they can beat it into the sheeple of America who don’t have enough intelligence to get information themselves. They can’t help it, public schools. Feingold is a valiant man. Why, the way he acted in such a partisan manner toward Judge Alito. No matter what anyone thinks about Alito, he is more than qualified for the job and has forgotten more about law than Feingold knows, but that did not stop Russ from acting like a spoiled child.

Feingold’s call for censure is what got him added to the Jackass of the month poll at my site. He has stiff competition though so he might not win.

Now if they actually found that Bush were guilty of something then it might be a different story. Feingold is executing payback. Andrew Jackson was the only President that impeachment proceedings were levied against until Clinton and that same Jackson was the only President to ever have a censure. It is a game that Feingold hopes will help into the White House in 2008. Fat chance.

]]> By: N. Mallory http://nmallory.exit-23.net/20060312/feingold-takes-a-stand#comment-1807 N. Mallory Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:06:38 +0000 http://nmallory.exit-23.net/20060312/feingold-takes-a-stand#comment-1807 I don't think anyone know for sure that it's illegal or not at this point. I think that's the big question on everyone's minds. I think the thing is that there needs to be an investigation and it's about time someone got around to it. Maybe if the Republicans would stop trying to block the normal balance and check activities of Congress, then the few Dems who have a backbone still out there wouldn't have to go to such extremes. I don’t think anyone know for sure that it’s illegal or not at this point. I think that’s the big question on everyone’s minds. I think the thing is that there needs to be an investigation and it’s about time someone got around to it. Maybe if the Republicans would stop trying to block the normal balance and check activities of Congress, then the few Dems who have a backbone still out there wouldn’t have to go to such extremes.

]]> By: Big Dog http://nmallory.exit-23.net/20060312/feingold-takes-a-stand#comment-1808 Big Dog Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:10:08 +0000 http://nmallory.exit-23.net/20060312/feingold-takes-a-stand#comment-1808 How can you censure someone for something that might not be wrong. I believe that the courts have ruled on this twice in the past, once for Clinton and once for Carter but I am not absolutley certain. Stare decisis, something Feingold and Schumer were fond of saying. How can you censure someone for something that might not be wrong.

I believe that the courts have ruled on this twice in the past, once for Clinton and once for Carter but I am not absolutley certain. Stare decisis, something Feingold and Schumer were fond of saying.

]]> By: n. mallory http://nmallory.exit-23.net/20060312/feingold-takes-a-stand#comment-1809 n. mallory Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:17:28 +0000 http://nmallory.exit-23.net/20060312/feingold-takes-a-stand#comment-1809 Neither of those cases were for <em>this</em> case and it's handling and it's particulars. If the Repubs had just let the investigation go ahead previously, we wouldn't be having this discussion now. Neither of those cases were for this case and it’s handling and it’s particulars. If the Repubs had just let the investigation go ahead previously, we wouldn’t be having this discussion now.

]]>