February 28th, 2006

Zogby Polls American Troops In Iraq

It seems like every time I turn around I’m told that the military is proud of what they are doing in Iraq and proud to be there. Mind you, I don’t hear that from the people I personally know in the military. I hear that from people on the internet who could be anyone really, but they usually claim to be a soldier, a soldier’s spouse or a soldier’s girlfriend.

And I’ve always said that I’m sure there are folks in both opinion camps regarding the war in Iraq.

However, Zogby International has actually taken a poll of 944 soldiers serving in Iraq and so now we don’t have to wonder. The results?

  • Le Moyne College/Zogby Poll shows just one in five troops want to heed Bush call to stay “as long as they are needed”
  • While 58% say mission is clear, 42% say U.S. role is hazy
  • Plurality believes Iraqi insurgents are mostly homegrown
  • Almost 90% think war is retaliation for Saddam’s role in 9/11, most don’t blame Iraqi public for insurgent attacks
  • Majority of troops oppose use of harsh prisoner interrogation
  • Plurality of troops pleased with their armor and equipment
  • An overwhelming majority of 72% of American troops serving in Iraq think the U.S. should exit the country within the next year, and nearly one in four say the troops should leave immediately, a new Le Moyne College/Zogby International survey shows.

    The poll, conducted in conjunction with Le Moyne College’s Center for Peace and Global Studies, showed that 29% of the respondents, serving in various branches of the armed forces, said the U.S. should leave Iraq “immediately,” while another 22% said they should leave in the next six months. Another 21% said troops should be out between six and 12 months, while 23% said they should stay “as long as they are needed.”

    Different branches had quite different sentiments on the question, the poll shows. While 89% of reserves and 82% of those in the National Guard said the U.S. should leave Iraq within a year, 58% of Marines think so. Seven in ten of those in the regular Army thought the U.S. should leave Iraq in the next year. Moreover, about three-quarters of those in National Guard and Reserve units favor withdrawal within six months, just 15% of Marines felt that way. About half of those in the regular Army favored withdrawal from Iraq in the next six months.

    I was particularly interested in these results:

    “Ninety-three percent said that removing weapons of mass destruction is not a reason for U.S. troops being there,” said Pollster John Zogby, President and CEO of Zogby International. “Instead, that initial rationale went by the wayside and, in the minds of 68% of the troops, the real mission became to remove Saddam Hussein.” Just 24% said that “establishing a democracy that can be a model for the Arab World” was the main or a major reason for the war. Only small percentages see the mission there as securing oil supplies (11%) or to provide long-term bases for US troops in the region (6%).

    I’m sure someone on the extreme right will say that this poll is skewed for use by the “moonbats”. In the end, people believe what they want, regardless of facts.

    tags: , , ,

    You may also enjoy...

    You can leave a comment, or trackback from your own site. RSS 2.0

    3 comments

    1. on February 28, 2006 at 7:20 pm

      Big Dog said:

      I will not say the poll is skewed but I will say it is biased. This is from the poll.
      The survey shows that most U.S. military personnel in-country have a clear sense of right and wrong when it comes to using banned weapons against the enemy, and in interrogation of prisoners. Four in five said they oppose the use of such internationally banned weapons as napalm and white phosphorous. And, even as more photos of prisoner abuse in Iraq surface around the world, 55% said it is not appropriate or standard military conduct to use harsh and threatening methods against insurgent prisoners in order to gain information of military value.

      White phosphorous is not a banned weapon. The US is not a signatore to the treaty and the use of these weapons is allowed per our laws and in accordance with the treaty that we did not ratify. To ask a question that poses the weapons as banned is biased. This information is readily available and the treaty and provisions are on the internet.

      I posted extensively about this when the moonbat blogs came out with their misinformed stories about banned weapons.

      The poll is what it is but the question is, who did they ask. If you ask a private you will get a different answer than if you ask a sergeant or an officer. Were they first termers or career soldiers? These questions and the audience will give different results.

    2. on February 28, 2006 at 7:40 pm

      n. mallory said:

      In answer to your question as to who was asked:

      Three quarters of the troops had served multiple tours and had a longer exposure to the conflict: 26% were on their first tour of duty, 45% were on their second tour, and 29% were in Iraq for a third time or more.

      Three of every four were male respondents, with 63% under the age of 30.

    3. on January 25, 2007 at 9:07 pm

      NGB said:

      Interesting figures! I can use these figures in my essay against the War In Iraq for school. Thanks!

    Leave a comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Flair

  • Meta

  • Bad Behavior has blocked 2270 access attempts in the last 7 days.

    Netflix, Inc.